Thursday, April 17, 2008

Buy into QBE

With the recent proposed and rejected merger/takeover the game is on between Insurance Australia Group (IAG) and QBE. The first offer was a salvo by QBE to see the reaction of investors and regulators. It was never meant to be the final offer and I think they will pay more to takeover QBE. I have written a number of times on both stocks and my preference is still QBE. I say this despite owning IAG shares, which have had a nice rise over the last week. IAG's stock closed at $4.38 yesterday compared with the $3.99 value of QBE's stock and cash takeover offer. So the market clearly expects a higher offer. I wouldn't be surprised if other local and overseas suitors are re-running the numbers over IAG, now that QBE has made its interest in the stock official.

Here's what the analysts are saying:

- QBE could pay as much as A$5 a share for Insurance Australia, Credit Suisse Group analyst Arjan van Veen said in a note to clients today. Citigroup Inc.'s Nigel Pittaway estimated a price of A$4.50, and Ryan Fisher at Goldman Sachs JBWere Pty said an offer in the ``mid-A$4s'' was possible.

- Merrill Lynch, meanwhile, believes QBE will come back with another bid and could offer up to $5.10 per IAG share and still make the deal cash earnings break-even.

- According to broker Credit Suisse, QBE's offer is greater than four times IAG's net tangible asset (NTA) value compared to recent QBE transactions at 1.5 to 1.75 times NTA.

- Analysts are unsure if the mega-merger will eventuate, with some musing that QBE, with its conservative approach to valuing targets, could find cheaper buys elsewhere. With or without IAG, analysts agreed with the assertion that QBE still has a decent pipeline of offshore deal opportunities.

- Goldman Sachs JBWere (GSJBW) believes that while QBE has room to increase its offer, it is unlikely to stump up enough capital to satisfy the IAG board, which is adamant IAG's shares are undervalued in a tough market.

What the companies are saying:

- IAG chairman James Strong acknowledged on Tuesday the merits of a tie-up between the two insurers, but only at the right price.

- In a sign the price might never be right, QBE indicated that it would not deviate from its usual deal requirement of achieving earnings accretion in year one.
How to profit from this merger

For short term investors the best way to make some money from this merger is to buy IAG shares. There is between 10-20% upside based on the average analyst recommendation. QBE's offer of $4, provides the floor for the stock, so at most you will lost 10% if QBE pulls out of the
merger/takeover tomorrow.

For longer term investors, like me, invest in QBE. It is a quality company that has taken a hit of late due to the global credit crisis. It is far better run than IAG from all reports. If it takes over/merges with IAG it will likely take some time to realize the synergies from the merger, but once it does it will probably add another $5 - $10 to the stock price in the medium term. Even if the takeover doesn't go ahead, QBE will find other options for growth and I see the share price going back to $30 by next year (assuming no major natural or man made catastrophes).

The rise of the US markets overnight should buoy both stock prices today, but stay tuned as there is a way to go with this deal.

1 COMMENTS:

Anonymous said...

I think QBE need to go back to the drawing board with IAG purchase. QBE are making out like they are the only buyer in town and that IAG needs to sell out. 99% of IAG's shareholders hold less than 5,000 shares so QBE has little chance of making this takeover happen unless the price is good enough to warrant a change in ownership. Even if the board give the green light I doubt shareholders will support the board to an extent they can get this bid over the line as most shareholders have these shares stuck in the bottom of a draw somewhere and would probably prefer the high current dividend they currently are getting from IAG. QBE are dreaming if they think they will get around $8 billion of premium income for $8 billion and then telling the market an IAG purchase will be earnings accretive in its first year. If that is the case they can stump up some more cash instead of their shares as I would rather have some Example, Suncorp paid nearly $8 billion for a company that generated $3.5. RBS is selling its insurance arm and early estimates would indicate that RBS should get around 8 billion pounds for an insurance company that generates GWP of around 6.3 billion pounds. The RBS insurance arm has a combined ratio of around 98% which looks to me to be worse than the current IAG combined ratio. What is QBE’s position in regard to AUS$ parity? In the annual report QBE said that its premium dropped by $700 million and profit dropped around $70 million due to the high Aussie dollar. What is QBE’s position on the succession plan for the CEO? How are the US purchases going considering the current US economical situation?

Post a Comment

All comments are welcome. Thanks for taking the time to read my blog and making a comment.